Retaliation and Wrongful Termination

Fired — or Punished — for the Wrong Reason: Know Your Rights

Most employment in DC and Maryland is “at will,” which means an employer can usually end the relationship without giving a reason. But “no reason required” has never meant “any reason allowed.” If you were fired, demoted, or punished because you complained about discrimination or harassment, reported wrongdoing, exercised a legal right, or refused to break the law, the law may give you a claim — and often a strong one. This overview explains the two ideas at the center of these cases, retaliation and wrongful termination, and routes you to the detailed pages for your situation. For discrimination based on who you are, rather than what you did, start instead with our Discrimination overview.

Retaliation: Punished for Doing Something Protected

Retaliation claims are the most common charge filed with the EEOC — they appear in more than half of all charges nationwide — and for a simple reason: the law protects the complaint as fiercely as it prohibits the underlying conduct. If you reported discrimination or harassment, participated in an investigation, requested an accommodation, asked about pay, or took protected leave, your employer cannot punish you for it. And the punishment doesn’t have to be a firing: any action serious enough to dissuade a reasonable worker from complaining can qualify. Learn how retaliation claims work.

Wrongful Termination: When a Firing Itself Breaks the Law

“Wrongful termination” is the phrase people search, and it covers two different legal ideas. The first is statutory: a firing that violates a specific law — discrimination, retaliation, whistleblower protection. The second is a narrower court-made exception to at-will employment: even with no statute on point, DC and Maryland courts will not let an employer fire someone for reasons that violate a clear public policy — refusing to break the law, exercising a legal right, reporting a crime. The two jurisdictions draw the lines differently, and the differences matter:

I work in Washington, DC.

DC recognizes a public-policy exception to at-will employment and has some of the country’s broadest statutory protections layered on top of it.

I work in Maryland.

Maryland calls the claim “abusive discharge” and polices its boundaries carefully — including a rule that the tort is generally unavailable where a statute already provides a remedy.

I am a federal employee.

Federal employees follow an entirely different route — the EEO process, the MSPB, and the Office of Special Counsel — with strict, short deadlines.

Two Situations That Deserve Their Own Pages

You Weren’t Fired — You Were Pushed Out

If working conditions became so intolerable that you resigned, the law may treat your resignation as a firing. That is called constructive discharge, and it has its own standard — and its own traps for people who quit before getting advice. Learn about constructive discharge.

The Mistreatment Is Ongoing

If you’re being harassed or targeted because of a protected trait but you’re still employed, the question is whether your workplace has become a hostile work environment — and both DC and Maryland recently rewrote their laws in workers’ favor on exactly this question. Learn about hostile work environment claims.

Where Retaliation Cases Come From

In our experience, retaliation and wrongful-termination claims usually begin inside one of the other areas we handle: a sexual harassment report that was answered with a demotion, a whistleblower disclosure followed by a termination, an accommodation request that made you a target, a wage complaint or protected leave that was held against you. Whatever the starting point, the retaliation claim is often stronger than the underlying one — juries understand payback.

What Compensation or Remedies Are Available?

Depending on the claim and jurisdiction, remedies can include reinstatement or front pay, back pay for lost wages, compensatory damages for emotional distress, punitive damages against private employers where the law allows, and attorney’s fees and costs. Deadlines vary widely — from 45 days for federal employees to contact an EEO counselor, to one year for a DC OHR complaint, 300 days for most Maryland MCCR charges, and up to three years for some court claims — so the safest assumption is that your clock is already running.

Frequently Asked Questions

Usually, yes — that is what at-will employment means. But “no reason” is different from “any reason.” A firing because of a protected trait, because you complained, because you reported wrongdoing, or because you refused to break the law crosses from unfair to unlawful. The legal question is never whether the firing was harsh; it is what actually drove it.

Retaliation is punishment — of any kind, not just firing — for doing something the law protects: complaining, participating in an investigation, requesting an accommodation, taking leave. Wrongful termination is a firing that itself breaks the law, whether by statute or under the court-made public-policy exceptions. One set of facts frequently supports both, which is why we evaluate them together.
It depends on who you are and where you work — and some windows are brutally short. Federal employees have 45 days to contact an EEO counselor. A DC OHR complaint allows one year; most Maryland MCCR charges allow 300 days; some court claims stretch to three years. Each adverse action generally starts its own clock, so assume yours is already running.

Related practice areas

Your situation may also involve one of these related areas of employment law:

Bottom Line

At-will employment protects employers from explaining themselves — it does not protect them from the consequences of an unlawful motive. If you were fired, pushed out, or punished after doing something the law protects, the sequence of events is evidence, the deadlines are short, and the retaliation claim is often stronger than people expect. Get the facts evaluated before a deadline decides the question for you.

Fired or Punished for Speaking Up at Work?

If you believe your employer retaliated against you or ended your employment for an unlawful reason, Wilkenfeld Law Office can review your situation and explain your legal options in DC or Maryland.
This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Reviewed by Ari Wilkenfeld, Esq. (DC Bar No. 461063; MD Bar No. 9806240300). Ari has over 27 years of experience litigating in federal and state courts, and before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), and various arbitration panels. Ari has been recognized by Esquire Magazine as “a famously determined Civil Rights lawyer” and by the New York Post as “a high powered DC Lawyer.” Last updated: November 1, 2026.
Scroll to Top