Family Responsibilities Discrimination

Family Responsibilities Discrimination at Work: Know Your Rights

If you believe you’ve been treated unfairly at work because you’re a parent or caregiver for a child, spouse, or aging parent, you may have a legal claim — though the legal theory that applies depends heavily on where you work. The right path forward depends on where you work and who you work for. For a general overview of how DC, Maryland, and federal employment law differ, see our Employment Discrimination overview. This page covers what’s specifically distinctive about family responsibilities and caregiver discrimination claims.

What Is Family Responsibilities Discrimination?

Family responsibilities (or “caregiver”) discrimination happens when an employer treats you unfairly because of
your responsibility to care for a child, spouse, partner, or other family member. This can include:

  • Being passed over for hiring or promotion based on stereotypes about caregivers
  • Being assigned to less prestigious or lower-paid roles after having children
  • Being denied leave or flexibility that’s granted to employees without caregiving duties
  • Harassment based on your status as a parent or caregiver
  • Retaliation against an employee who complains about caregiver discrimination

Federal Law: No Standalone Protection, But Real Legal Theories

This is an important distinction to understand. Neither “caregiver status” nor “family responsibilities” is its own protected category under federal law. But the EEOC has issued detailed enforcement guidance (first in 2007, supplemented in 2022) explaining that caregiver discrimination often violates existing federal laws through several established theories:
  • Sex-plus discrimination under Title VII. Since a 1971 Supreme Court case, Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp, courts have recognized that treating mothers differently than fathers — for example, refusing to hire women with young children while hiring men with young children — is a form of sex discrimination, even though “parent” itself isn’t the protected trait.
  • Associational discrimination under the ADA. The ADA prohibits discriminating against an employee based on their association with someone who has a disability — including a child, spouse, or parent the employee cares for. An employer can’t assume a caregiver will be unreliable and deny a promotion or job on that basis.
  • Race, national origin, and age theories. The EEOC’s guidance also covers caregiver discrimination intertwined with race or national origin bias (like assuming a Latina mother will deprioritize her career), and age-based assumptions about older caregivers.
None of this creates a new protected category — but it means a caregiver treated unfairly because of sex stereotypes, disability association, race, or age may have a real federal claim, even without a specific “family responsibilities” law.

Which Laws Apply to You?

DC and Maryland handle this topic very differently from each other. Select the situation that matches yours:

I work for a private employer or local government in Washington, DC.

DC has protected family responsibilities as its own standalone trait since the DCHRA’s original 1977 enactment — you don’t need to rely on a sex-plus or associational theory at all. Learn about family responsibilities discrimination protections in DC.

I work for a private employer in Maryland.

Maryland has no statewide family responsibilities protection under FEPA. The only Maryland jurisdiction that protects it locally is Montgomery County, whose ordinance prohibits discrimination based on “family responsibilities.” Outside Montgomery County, a Maryland worker would need to rely on the same federal sex-plus, associational, or other theories described above, since state law doesn’t independently cover this.

I am a federal government employee.

The same federal theories described above apply to you, through Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act, using the
federal EEO process. Learn about family responsibilities discrimination protections for federal employees.

What Compensation or Remedies Are Available?

Because this topic usually proceeds under an existing law (sex discrimination, disability association, etc.) rather than its own category, the remedies available are whatever that underlying law provides — back pay, front pay, reinstatement, and compensatory and punitive damages, subject to whatever cap (or lack of one) applies under the specific law and jurisdiction involved.

Talk to a Family Responsibilities Discrimination Attorney

This is a topic where identifying the right legal theory matters enormously — DC gives you a direct, standalone claim, while federal law and most of Maryland require framing the claim around sex, disability association, or another existing protected trait. Wilkenfeld Law Office can help you figure out which approach fits your situation.
Schedule a consultation

Or call 301.245.3035 · Intake@WilkenfeldLO.com

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Reviewed by Ari Wilkenfeld, Esq. (DC Bar No. 461063; MD Bar No. 9806240300). Ari has over 27 years of experience litigating in federal and state courts, and before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), and various arbitration panels. Ari has been recognized by Esquire Magazine as “a famously determined Civil Rights lawyer” and by the New York Post as “a high powered DC Lawyer.” Last updated: August 28, 2026.
Scroll to Top